Keywords: Cognitive aging, healthy volunteers, neuropsychological tests, regression analyses ![]() Geriatrics, Linköping University Hospital, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden. Psychologist, PhD, Memory Clinic, Department of Acute Internal Medicine and | Department of Activity and Health, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, SwedenĬorrespondence to: Elisabet Classon, Lic. | Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Society and Health, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden | Mindmore AB, Stockholm, Sweden, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden dĪffiliations: Department of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden 2016 87(12):1303–1310.Authors: Classon, Elisabet a * | van den Hurk, Wobbie b | Lyth, Johan c | Johansson, Maria M. ![]() Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. Defining and validating a short form Montreal Cognitive Assessment (s-MoCA) for use in neurodegenerative disease. Determining a Short Form Montreal Cognitive Assessment (s-MoCA) Czech Version: Validity in Mild Cognitive Impairment Parkinson’s Disease and Cross-Cultural Comparison. Cognitive tests to detect dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tsoi KF, Chan JC, Hirai HW, Wong SS, Kwok TY. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. Alzheimer’s & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association. Neuropsychological testing and assessment for dementia. Jacova C, Kertesz A, Blair M, Fisk JD, Feldman HH. MoCA brief cognitive test dementia mild cognitive impairment short variants.Ĭopyright © 2019 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. It provides a viable alternative when it is not feasible to administer the original MoCA in clinical practice and can be especially useful in nonspecialty clinics with large volumes of patients at high risk of cognitive impairment (such as those in primary care, geriatric, and stroke prevention clinics). This variant is one-third the length of the original MoCA and can be completed in <5 minutes. Only the short variant by Roalf et al was comparable to the original MoCA in identifying MCI or dementia even across education subgroups. The various short variants may not share similar diagnostic performance, with many limited by ceiling effects among participants with higher education. ![]() In contrast, the short variant by Roalf et al had 87.2% sensitivity and 72.1% specificity at its optimal cut-off score of <13. At the optimal cut-off score of <25, the original MoCA demonstrated 84.4% sensitivity and 76.4% specificity. Among the participants with higher education, only the variant by Roalf et al had similar AUC to the original MoCA. However, only 2 variants by Roalf et al (2016) and Wong et al (2015) demonstrated comparable performance (AUC 88.4-88.9%) to the original MoCA (AUC 89.3%). The various short variants of MoCA were compared in their performance in discriminating MCI/dementia, using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs).Īll 7 short variants of MoCA had acceptable performance in discriminating MCI/dementia from normal cognition (AUC 87.7%-91.0%). Participants completed MoCA and were evaluated for MCI/dementia. Participants aged ≥50 years (n = 4606), with median age 70 (interquartile range 65-76). This study evaluated the comparative performance of the short variants in identifying mild cognitive impairment or dementia (MCI/dementia).Īlzheimer's Disease Centers across the United States. While various short variants of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) have been developed, they have not been compared among each other to determine the most optimal variant for routine use.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |